European Association of Social Anthropologists: Institutional Boycott

This page records specific public conduct. It does not claim knowledge of private beliefs or motives.

Documented record

• 2024-11-11: EASA reports that 78% of voting members supported a motion not to collaborate with Israeli academic institutions; the guidelines preserve individual participation and publication. Source 1 Source 2

Where Galil stands

Our opinion: Galil opposes singling out Israel or Israeli institutions for boycott or divestment. The action is documented above; the judgment is ours.

---

Sources manually reviewed 2026-07-26. Corrections and later context will be appended to this page.